Democracy is dysgenic; Group selection prefers hierarchy; Social Darwinism + Eugenics = Prosperity.

No.13407104 ViewReplyOriginalReport
The abolition and general dissolution of the class system in Western societies has been a terrible mistake. We were warned by many philosophers of democracy's dysgenic affect on civilization but we didn't listen and now look were we are.
Although, we still have classes, our societies are no longer as stratified as one might hope them to be, and the lower classes are allowed privileges which should not belong to them, like voting and the rule over culture.

It is a basic fact that democracy and populism needs must give way to anarchism, yet nature through group selection seems to favour hierarchy and annihilates the populations which live in anarchy (especially as they get larger).

I do not advocate a simple caste system, à la the hindus, but the general promotion of the lower classes in society has been a disaster. What we should strive for is the noble """lie""" of Socrates, but founded upon genetic truth.
As we all know, there are some qualities which make some men more fit to rule than others. We as a society should artificially select for these qualities and establish hereditary lineages upon them or at the very least we must return to the older system were people had to prove their worth to their nation (i.e. there group) to be promoted, or come from a lineage that already has (the latter being a tried and true, but less precise form of the former.)