Is climate change real and man-made? Is it a hoax?
If it's a hoax, why do nearly 100% about climate science scientific publications favor the theory that it is man-made?
Is there a scientific consensus, and if not, why are all publications in consensus, broadly speaking?
If it's a hoax, there's an extremely high political interest in climate change not being real, so why don't they fund the hell out of scientists who search for the truth instead? (Consider all the wealthy industry lobbyists who are ready to sink money into this.)
If it's a hoax, why did the scientific process fail so badly, even though science in general is responsible for the accelerated progress in the recent century, in a magnitude which has been never seen before in human history?
Can climate change be stopped or slowed down? If it was man-made, why can't it be man-unmade?
Regarding the political nature of the problem, why does the political right prefer to ignore the problem, which lead to the left picking it up as a topic for themselves, making the solution of the problem even harder? (Consider the decidedly idiotic eat bugs meme, which serves to scare away the general public from participating in solutions.)

Picture unrelated.