>>13405769>Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, This includes the broken study, dumbnut. Remove it, and the whole argument falls apart. Which is the whole fucking problem.
>Ok fine. Isn't it worthwhile to INVESTIGATE it? And quickly.Of course. These investigations are called "studies". Astonishing, isn't it.
>But there is no impetus for a clinical study.I don't know how clinical studies are decided, but fortunately neither do you.
Also, your own post refuted your claim it's not being investigated, thanks I guess.
>Those standards exist because time has shown them to be necessary.Which is why the vaccines had to go through tough trials. It wasn't just greenlit without studies as you seem to imply.
>So when you declare mRNA vaccines as safe you are talking shit and you know it. The testing was short circuited because of a pandemic. Fine. But then one can turn around and declare it safe?It's as safe as it has been objectively demonstrated. It's safer than a COVID infection. We know no mechanism of action that could cause long term effects.
>Bullshit and you know it.You retards act as of the vaccines were literally poison that makes people drop dead by the thousands. How is that not bullshit? How about all the FUD the right wing media churns out and that is PROVEN to be bullshit? Explain yourself.
>Its just a far right bunch of hooha.Well you see, whatever rightcucks parade through the news usually gets proven wrong. Remember Hydroxychloroquine? Objectively, you could make the statement that far right media cannot be trusted and that even mainstream media are better at reporting objectively and accurately.
>Perhaps someone should bother to ask the Indians how they use it?You know how that is determined? With studies.
