>>13388607Yea. I know they saw other shit on the east coast, but I'm being very precise about the tictac here. That document I'm familiar with, and the shape description is obviously inconclusive. "lozenge", "circular", "elliptical", which is it?
I believe in aliens don't misinterpret me here. But the phenomenon being reported by Navy pilots has some very distinctive elements
>multiple sightings of a consistent shape >confirmed by multiple personnel, all navy>confirmed by radar but with difficulty at times>always spotted during training drills or routine coastal training flightsThese things show up in safe, restricted airspace under Navy occupation, during training missions. And to my knowledge the vast majority of the encounters involve unarmed fighter jets. I can only presume this is to ensure no one gets jumpy and tries to shoot your new experimental toy down. Note that Fravor was directly asked by his commanding officer while on intercept whether he was armed. His officer would, or at least could and probably should, have known this as the flight plans and armaments are prescheduled, but they were double checking just to make sure because he was about to witness some extremely sensitive equipment.
Furthermore, if we think critically about the Nimitz incident, it completely violates publicly known Naval rules of engagement. Carrier strike groups enforce a strict perimeter up to hundreds of miles in radius. If an unknown craft breached that perimeter, armed and lethal interceptors would be scrambled as part of standard procedure. Within a certain range the ROE gives discretionary permission to kill. Distance is the carrier strike groups primary defense. Keep in mind these tictacs were making repeated incursions.
They fire on fishing boats if they get too close. A highly dynamic aircraft is at least going to get an armed jet response
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-uae-ship/u-s-navy-fires-on-fishing-boat-near-uae-1-killed-idUSBRE86F0S620120716 
