>>13384841>Signs about any other race wouldn't get the same reaction because those groups are not majorities that have historically been overwhelmingly advantaged."Whites" are a majority depending on who you categorize as "white", and where you are looking (the entire US for example). Why is it about being historically advantaged? If you go by who is advantaged right now, Jews are more wealthy and have better social outcomes than non-Jewish whites. Asians/Indians have a higher average wealth/income, lower crime, and presumably other things. The only thing I know of that is worse is Asians are underrepresented as CEOs. Although I think it is east asians specifically that have these better outcomes and statistics.
>>13384862Why is giving whites (and asians) a penalty in their score admissions are based on not persecution? That is racial discrimination.
>They look for decent students in poor placesIf you give blacks/hispanics an advantage, you're going to have people that are in a place their actual ability would not get them into, and rejecting students that would have done better. The percentage of students of each race changes. I didn't say anything about the process other than that is different or that they were suddenly getting the worst students instead of prioritizing the best, that is not necessary to cause problems, obviously.
>>13384870I'm not a white supremacist. If you think I'm a "white supremacist" for saying I think whites have a higher IQ, if anything you should call me an Ashkenazi or maybe Asian supremacist, shouldn't you?
>Yes, that's what dog whistles are, you dishonest faggot. It's socially unacceptable for you white supremacists to say shit like "I hate niggers", so you code the language into "it's ok to be white" to identify other white supremacists.Wait, so what are you arguing against if it isn't that notion itself? There are probably a million things you could talk about in terms of what they might mean by something..
