>>13388924>But it's a much more constructive way of looking at the problem:>>Doesn't invoke genetics, dodging the racism card>>Offers leads for ameliorating the situationDodging the most plausible hypothesis is constructive ?
No, on the contrary, your explanation is destructive. Because it implies that blacks are being wronged, and causes them to resent whites, to reject whatever can be construed as whiteness (like education or lawfulness); and to stop trying to work on themselves, preferring to start by fighting the man that keeps them down.
And the more we do to help them out (desegregation, welfare and social programs, bussing, scholarships, quotas, positive discrimination...), the more they ask for, which is only normal because the outcomes don't change (since the problem isn't social) so the only solution is to go further and take more from whites to give to blacks. Now they're starting to seriously demand "reparations" while they loot and burn and find new ways to blame us.
