>>13376695Its accurate in that climate models are nowhere near correct, everything that escapes the modeler's imagination or is intentionally excluded, does not factor into the model's results.
back in the 90s, the himalayas were a high elevation plain on most models because including more detailed geographic information than that on a model made it's run time become unreasonable.
nearly all contemporary models take place in an imaginary 0ºK universe and that factor alone causes the impact of CO2 on temperature to be overestimated by 10% - 25%.
The pleb approach to calculating planetary temperatures can be viewed in action here
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stefan–Boltzmann_law#Effective_temperature_of_the_EarthWhere do they get an albedo for a planet that stores solar energy as chemical potential energy via photosynthesis and other processes?
Ludwig Boltzmann rolling over in his grave cause of that stupidity, not everything is a blackbody.
