This is Artesian Hour General. This is for all of you with "Big Ideas" which are 100% science and are master crafted by an artesian such as yourself. If you're taking a break from the lab, you can come here to practice the rhetoric you need when writing grants, proposals, speaking to the media, journal articles, and interest pieces for major publications, all of which you are awarded due to your 100% real science idea and your effort-honed rhetoric.
If you have a big science idea and lots of science back it up, if you can make references to published scientific concepts to legitimize your claim with all sorts of measurements and studies, that's what we're all about here.
If you've got some dope arguments about science that are 100% science, bring it here. Claims like "Show me a study" are always good. Claims like "false logic" are for people trying to cop out of an argument, unwilling to address points, and instead attempting to "claim victory through forfeit". False logic is the seasoning of rhetoric, it is the backbone of every social science, and that's why those skills are important for artesian scientists like you.
If you need some practice writing, using rhetoric to justify your claims and theories, this is the spot. This is proxy-science, because we try to use our understanding of science to produce arguments, but don't actually try to use science.
>Every great scientific discovery was a hypothesis before it was codified by empirical data produced by replicable experiments.
If you're only on step 1, hypothesis, then you must rely on rhetoric, references, and persuasion in order to justify your claims to the point where you receive funding to carry out your scientific experiment or study.
If you have a big science idea and lots of science back it up, if you can make references to published scientific concepts to legitimize your claim with all sorts of measurements and studies, that's what we're all about here.
If you've got some dope arguments about science that are 100% science, bring it here. Claims like "Show me a study" are always good. Claims like "false logic" are for people trying to cop out of an argument, unwilling to address points, and instead attempting to "claim victory through forfeit". False logic is the seasoning of rhetoric, it is the backbone of every social science, and that's why those skills are important for artesian scientists like you.
If you need some practice writing, using rhetoric to justify your claims and theories, this is the spot. This is proxy-science, because we try to use our understanding of science to produce arguments, but don't actually try to use science.
>Every great scientific discovery was a hypothesis before it was codified by empirical data produced by replicable experiments.
If you're only on step 1, hypothesis, then you must rely on rhetoric, references, and persuasion in order to justify your claims to the point where you receive funding to carry out your scientific experiment or study.
