/sci/ - Science & Math » Thread #13354049

1MiB, 1080x1792, Screenshot_20210703-123340_Chrome.jpg

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO

Jannies are retarded

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 09:36:31 2021 No.13354049 View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>13354078 >>13354122 >>13354205 >>13354217 >>13354294 >>13354383

ITT we discuss why jannies delete actual math threads while letting /pol/tards and schizos shitpost all over the board.

>>13353043

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 09:38:25 No.13354054 Report

Quoted By:

>>13354007
>how can you factor in croaking behaviour when it says they are random, unpredictable, and distribution over time is unknown?
How do any of those things stop you from factoring in croaking behavior? They are standard stochastic descriptions.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 09:45:07 No.13354078 Report

Quoted By: >>13354203

>>13354049
>nooooo jannies removed my hecking schizo thread
Still haven't taken your meds, I see.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 10:05:07 No.13354122 Report

Quoted By: >>13354532

>>13354049
My thread on balding got deleted AND I got a ban because retarded faggots couldn't actually discuss the topic without devolving into /r9k/-tier PUA and lifting advice.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 10:54:28 No.13354203 Report

Quoted By: >>13354609

>>13354078
I didn't make the thread.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 10:55:22 No.13354205 Report

Quoted By: >>13354211

>>13354049
Isn't it just 50/50?

Assuming that one of the two frogs croaked, we can say that at least one is a male frog and therefore carries no remedy so the one of the two licks will be irrelevant. The remaining frog that did not croak has a 50/50 chance of being either male or female. Since you lick both frogs anyways, it's a coinflip

Then again, I'm not a stat fag so I might be missing something.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 11:00:35 No.13354211 Report

Quoted By: >>13354277

>>13354205
You are missing that male and female frogs are not equally likely to not croak, so the probability a silent frog is male is not equal to the probability it's female.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 11:03:59 No.13354217 Report

Quoted By:

>>13354049
same brother. I was posting acc good threads that garnered discussion on relevant topics now all of them are bumped or deleted by /pol/ fags.

Jans wont do anything about it so I decided to take an accelerationist approach and decided to start posting iq threads with unbeliabely low quality. Id suggest u do the same, either that or let the pol fags win

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 11:29:46 No.13354277 Report

Quoted By: >>13354345

>>13354211
Would the probability that the silent frog is male be greater or lesser than the probability of it being female?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 11:32:24 No.13354294 Report

Quoted By: >>13354513

>>13354049
FIGHT BACK BY DOGSHITTING UR OWN THREADS, these fkn janinies wont do shit start wiping cancer all over ur threads make them as foul as possible make them IQ threads anti vaxx critical race theory etc bs they wont listen to us anyway

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 11:50:20 No.13354345 Report

Quoted By:

>>13354277
Females are always silent and males are not always silent. You tell me.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 11:58:40 No.13354383 Report

Quoted By: >>13354428 >>13354855

>>13354049
Trick question
>chance of death is 100%
Surviving and death are collectively exhaustive events, therefore:
P(surviving) = 1 - P(death) = 1 - 1 = 0
Any other answer is schizo bullshit.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 12:00:24 No.13354392 Report

Quoted By: >>13354905

50/50. we've got one that is 100% male, the other one is unkown. there is a 50% chance it is a female or male that didn't yet croaked. because we don't know the croaking time we can't say if it a male or female.

you can argue it's more than 50% because it's a higher chance of being a female than a male that didn't make noise, but how much above 50% we don't know, so we round it down to 50%.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 12:06:59 No.13354428 Report

Quoted By: >>13354451

>>13354383
you stuiped shithead, they say it is 100% when you don't take the remedy, if you take it you are ok.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 12:09:39 No.13354442 Report

Quoted By:

Surviving for how long?
You're not immortal so the answer is 0

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 12:12:11 No.13354451 Report

Quoted By:

>>13354428
It doesn't say that at all, you donkey fucking imbecile. It says that death = 100%, and that licking a rare frog is a "remedy" for something. Since we are already given death = 100%, it clearly can't be a remedy for not dying, you absolute retard.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO __imaizumi_kagerou_touhou_drawn_ (...).jpg, 155KiB, 900x900

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 12:32:18 No.13354513 Report

Quoted By: >>13354587

>>13354294
Based and disdain-pilled.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 12:37:55 No.13354532 Report

Quoted By: >>13354628

>>13354122
>bald
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 12:38:50 No.13354536 Report

Quoted By: >>13354545 >>13354648 >>13354689

What I don't understand is the fact that the jans decided to put the schizo thread I saw on auto-sage instead of just deleting it. Why are you having this trash taking up an extra slot in the catalogue?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 12:42:41 No.13354545 Report

Quoted By: >>13354550

>>13354536
They're afraid of upsetting him.
The jannies fear the schizo.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 12:45:10 No.13354550 Report

Quoted By:

>>13354545
Well he is back yet again, so we can all bask in his wonder intellect.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1624902141345.gif, 639KiB, 500x281

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 13:02:04 No.13354587 Report

Quoted By:

50-50, you die or you don't.

>>13354513
You won't survive my hugpoooooooooost!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 13:11:53 No.13354609 Report

Quoted By: >>13354623 >>13354915

>>13354203
okay well the guy who does spam the frog question is actually a huge disingenuous faggot. His question is vauge enough in a specific way that you arguably can't properly answer it. And even though you can, especially by using monte carlo, the autistic retard OP spends days arguing with people telling all of them that they can't get his problem right.

It would be an actual math thread it the faggot spamming it wasn't such a faggot, eh.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO heh.jpg, 13KiB, 281x283

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 13:17:45 No.13354623 Report

Quoted By:

>>13354609
>It would be an actual math thread it the faggot spamming
And the same goes for the retard who can't into linear algebra and will never EVER understand 3D projeciton.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 13:19:37 No.13354628 Report

Quoted By: >>13354708

>>13354532
Imagine being so insecure about hair that you can't even have an intelligent discussion on a science board.

For the record, I found a study on bald vs hair reproductive rates from 1911 and it found zero statistical difference between them. It's all in your heads.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO __cirno_rumia_kamishirasawa_kein (...).jpg, 472KiB, 2150x1798

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 13:27:09 No.13354648 Report

Quoted By: >>13354652

>>13354536
Dude what if there are hidden gems of great scientific value in the thread, janjan can't just blindly punish all of the ret-posters in the thread just because of OP's crimes.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 13:28:31 No.13354652 Report

Quoted By: >>13354672

>>13354648
If you are the one encouraging him I actually find that pretty cruel.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO __toyosatomimi_no_miko_touhou_dr (...).jpg, 124KiB, 700x947

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 13:35:29 No.13354672 Report

Quoted By:

>>13354652
Encouraging who?

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO jannied.png, 349KiB, 1080x1278

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 13:42:45 No.13354689 Report

Quoted By:

>>13354536
>muh heckin extra spot
The jannoid on /sci/ regularly obliterates almost half the catalog.
I don't think "a thread died for this" is a concern.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1868f3813f27e3488757fa765b863901.jpg, 221KiB, 850x1258

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 13:49:10 No.13354696 Report

Quoted By:

Reminder to keep reporting all the provocative threads aimed hatefully at LGBT people!

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 13:54:05 No.13354708 Report

Quoted By:

>>13354628
Too many social changes, anon.
You're comparing completely different reproductive environments.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 13:57:37 No.13354713 Report

Quoted By: >>13354717

Tranny janny today is the same fag who would be removing the haruhi threads that popped up all the time since they were spam. The /sci/ never would have solved that problem. What the fuck is jannys problem?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 13:58:58 No.13354717 Report

Quoted By: >>13354727

>>13354713
Are you defending spam?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 14:01:46 No.13354727 Report

Quoted By: >>13354732

>>13354717
Define spam.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 14:04:44 No.13354732 Report

Quoted By: >>13354736

>>13354727
Creating 15+ threads on some shitty /b/ tier probability puzzles is spam.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 14:06:38 No.13354736 Report

Quoted By: >>13354738 >>13354776 >>13354780

>>13354732
that's not a /b/tier probability puzzle. but you have to actually understand math to realize how, which less than 10% of /sci/ apparently does. give me a concrete definition of spam, and why the /mg/ and /sfg/ threads aren't spam yet the probability on croaking is.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 14:08:37 No.13354738 Report

Quoted By: >>13354744

>>13354736
>concrete definition of spam
the schizo thread on the frontpage that is 90% the guy talking to himself. Is objectively spam.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 14:10:29 No.13354744 Report

Quoted By: >>13354767 >>13354776

>>13354738
again, not a definition of spam. you're just saying
>see! that thread is spam!
what is spam? give me a concrete definition, and justify how /mg/ and /sgf/aren't spam, while simultaneously justifying how the frog croaking problem is spam.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 14:17:33 No.13354767 Report

Quoted By: >>13354772 >>13354776 >>13354792

>>13354744
I think this spam debate is stupid, nothing should be considered spam. SPAM IS FREE SPEECH.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 14:19:13 No.13354772 Report

Quoted By:

>>13354767
not even close to my argument. all I want is for this faggot to justify his claim. he thinks the thread is removed because it's spam, yet he can't even tell me what spam is.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 14:20:49 No.13354776 Report

Quoted By: >>13354783

>>13354736
Regardless on whether it's a "good" puzzle or a "/b/tier" puzzle the fact is OP was spamming the catalog with those threads and the jannissaries cracked down on him. The guy who made ten trillion linear algebra threads asking /sci/ to help him with his 3D projection stuff is a spammer as well and they deleted his shit too and left only one of his threads up.

>>13354744
If /sfg/ and /mg/ started creating 15+ duplicate threads I'm sure they would be deleted too.

>>13354767
Yeah, I'm sure you'd enjoy twenty concurrent Tooker and Mohammed Ababou threads on the catalog.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 14:23:07 No.13354780 Report

Quoted By:

>>13354736
Not him, but yes, the retarded frog problem is absolutely /b/tier spam, and the only reason you think no one understands it is that the only point to posting in those threads is to troll the schizo Haddock poster.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 14:23:53 No.13354783 Report

Quoted By: >>13354805

>>13354776
the frog croaking thread is posted once at a time, and not even immediately after it hits the bump limit. same for the /mg/. what is different about the frog thread than the /mg/ such that, by your retarded reasoning, it's spam? how many /mg/ threads have been made by now? certainly 15+

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 14:26:24 No.13354792 Report

Quoted By:

>>13354767
>muh heckin free speecherino.
A board based on "free speech" is a ruse. It sounds good when you say it (muh 1776, muh founding fathers, muh enlightement) until you realize you're gonna need to protect the speech of /pol/tards, homework posters, religion threads and so on.
If you want to see what a "free speech" board on 4chan would look like go take a look at /qa/.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 14:30:45 No.13354805 Report

Quoted By: >>13354841

>>13354783
>muh heckin frog croaking threaderino
It's not about the frog croaking thread retard it's about the OP who created it.
If it was created by somebody else on a random Tuesday it would probably go unscathed like the million portal threads and golden coin threads we had.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 14:42:03 No.13354841 Report

Quoted By: >>13354872 >>13354879

>>13354805
so the problem isn't spam? It's a specific user? If a single person was making all the /mg/ threads they'd be removed? What if it's only two people making them?

If it'd be allowed if other people made it, then it's not fucking spam you moron.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 14:48:28 No.13354855 Report

Quoted By:

>>13354383
literally unironically this

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 14:56:10 No.13354872 Report

Quoted By: >>13354876 >>13354938

>>13354841
I don't fucking know why it was actually deleted it but I can only speculate that it's because the OP was spamming probability puzzle threads and they deleted every thread he made. /mg/ isn't spam because it's a general, you idiot. There is only one /mg/ on the catalog not 10+ /mg/ threads. If there were, they would delete them as spam too.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 14:57:29 No.13354876 Report

Quoted By: >>13354918

>>13354872
there has never once been more than one frog croaking thread on the catalog at a time, unless one hit the bump limit. which the /mg/ does too: post another once bump limit is hit.

honestly, stop making shit up.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 14:57:43 No.13354879 Report

Quoted By: >>13354897

>>13354841
just call it frog autism general, then you and all your other /fag/ mates can go in there and circle jerk about bayes all you want

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 15:03:35 No.13354897 Report

Quoted By: >>13354937

>>13354879
so that's literally it? jannies wouldn't remove it if it was just titled /cg/—croaking general? Fucking kek.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 15:05:37 No.13354905 Report

Quoted By:

>>13354392
>there is a 50% chance it is a female or male that didn't yet croaked
Wrong.

>but how much above 50% we don't know, so we round it down to 50%.
Doesn't follow.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 15:10:05 No.13354915 Report

Quoted By:

>>13354609
>His question is vauge enough in a specific way that you arguably can't properly answer it.
You're projecting your stupidity onto others.

Also, the fact that you think a Monte Carlo simulation answers the problem yet think Bayes theorem is somehow inadequate, when they both use the exact same reasoning, indicates you're an idiot.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO 1595497495884.png, 132KiB, 782x758

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 15:11:03 No.13354918 Report

Quoted By: >>13354928

>>13354876
>NOOOOOOOO NOT THE HECKIN GOOD BOI FROAG CROAK THREADERINO NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO NOT THE HECKIN ONCE IN A LIFE TIME FROG CROAK PROBABILITY PUZZLERINO NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO YOU ARE DOING ME A FRIGHTEN JANNIE I AM SO ANGRY RIGHT NOW NOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Why the fuck did the demise of the frog croak thread upset you so much? I don't get it.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 15:14:56 No.13354928 Report

Quoted By: >>13354937

>>13354918
>Why the fuck did the demise of the frog croak thread upset you so much? I don't get it.
because jannies on /sci/ are removing fucking math threads. it's objectively a math thread. I can let certain science topics being removed slide because the definition of science isn't as well-defined. But removing a fucking math thread? Which is clearly math? If the jannies applied the same reasoning years ago, all the haruhi threads would've been removed and /sci/ never would've solved that problem.

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO __inaba_tewi_touhou_drawn_by_esu (...).png, 672KiB, 1623x2473

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 15:19:09 No.13354937 Report

Quoted By: >>13354940 >>13354945 >>13354955

>>13354897
Technically there'd still be grounds for deletion because it's off-topic, but jannies don't actually enforce the off-topic rule with anything even distantly resembling consistency.
>>13354928
>it's objectively a math thread.
It's objectively a semantics thread about a boring ass problem that has been posted five billion times.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 15:20:23 No.13354938 Report

Quoted By:

>>13354872
Last time it was deleted for being "off-topic." Some retarded janny is butthurt at this specific problem and deletes it for false reasons.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 15:21:49 No.13354940 Report

Quoted By: >>13354947

>>13354937
It's not off-topic. Do you do this for free?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 15:23:48 No.13354945 Report

Quoted By: >>13354969

>>13354937
look at the front page of the catalog right now. a majority of the threads up right now have nothing to do with science or math, much less so than a literal math problem about frogs croaking.
>Do intelligent people switch 'effect' and 'affect' or say 'irregardless'?
Not science.
>wtf am i supposed to do after graduation
Not science or math.
>we can discuss the fact that we are conscious ....
Not science.
So on, and so forth.

And yet, a literal math thread that's obviously not even homework help is removed. For fucks sake. Considering leaving this faggy board over this shit. For context I'm the one who offers somewhat daily high quality posts like the ones about blue-green and absorption spectrum here
>>13354866

Anonymous

View Same Google iqdb SauceNAO __himemushi_momoyo_touhou_drawn_ (...).png, 24KiB, 800x550

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 15:24:44 No.13354947 Report

Quoted By:

>>13354940
Do what, shitpost and insult people?
Absolutely. Why, are you some sort of glow in the dark being paid to do it?

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 15:28:38 No.13354955 Report

Quoted By: >>13354969

>>13354937
>i have spent all day errrday looking at /sci/ for years on end. thats why other people who aren't social media obsessed, mentally ill, narcissistic autogynephiliacs, shouldn't be allowed to see a thread that is unfamiliar to them, becuase i saw something similar three years ago. all of the content on /sci/ needs to be catered to me specifically.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 15:33:54 No.13354969 Report

Quoted By: >>13354975

>>13354945
>Considering leaving this faggy board over this shit.
Feel free.
>>13354955
>all of the content on /sci/ needs to be catered to me specifically.
Correct.

Anonymous

Anonymous Sat 03 Jul 2021 15:35:46 No.13354975 Report

Quoted By:

>>13354969
>Feel free.
I don't need permission. My point is that if jannies keep doing this shit, they'll drive away the few high quality posters they have left. though I doubt they'd even notice it, since I'm convinced the jannies are 17-18 year old morons.

Anonymous

Anonymous ## Mod Sat 03 Jul 2021 15:50:40 No.13355003 Report

Quoted By:

This thread was moved to >>>/qa/4634541

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

Your latest searches