>>13349808There is no science in it. There is no mention of the scientific method, or any method that is similar to the scientific method, nor is any such method applied in any sense.
As far as a historical source thats a question for >>/his/ but it's a mix of historical accounts and mythology, much like any religious document.
>>13349893Irrelevant and incorrect at the same time! Arabic translations gave Europe access to certain "lost" texts by Greek philosophers, which were already known but unavailable to contemporary scholars.
>>13349897The metaphysics are absolute dogshit, the Arabian scholars a few hundred years later had to shoehorn in some mangled neoplatonic metaphysics just to make it palatable, the Quran itself is embarrassingly bad at explaining the metaphysical, it loses out to even the New Testament.
Also sage for off topic thread
