>>13641055>Science isn't about consensusScience does involve listening and discussing things with your peers and seeing their data and explanations as well.
>it never has been and never will be. Again, consensus, like in religion or science has no bearing on the truth. But it does. If more people replicate the same experiment and gets the same results while you don't, it's probably your experiment that is wrong. Maybe not always but let's be realistic.
>Only the demonstrable evidence through studies and isolation of variables can show what is objectively true or probable... and which is still always subject to change upon refutation. Yes and other scientists have done the same. Why are you ignoring them
>Scientists are just as easily bought and coerced as politicians or charities.The same could be said about you retard. Especially when there's the off chance that you're just a shill/bot trying to confuse everyone.
>The funding structure behind modern day science, from the university level to the government level, tells you all you need to know about how "ethical" it is. You're free to get a degree yourself and make papers without their help if you want. No one is stopping you from gaining credibility. You just don't want to put in the work and complain about some vague boogeyman from your bed because it's easier.
>Big Pharma is the largest lobby in DC, on television, and in journal media. Okay. That doesn't mean you can just deny evidence from thousands of people in order to live in a constant delusion about what most highly creditable experts believe.
>I wasn't born yesterday, lol.Clearly you were since you don't understand the very basics and pretend to know what you're talking about despite having no experience in the field of virology.
