>>13600208>>13600234you wouldnt be wasting your time if you took an intro course on the fundamentals of math.
these aren't the disagreements or arguments mathematicians have, because they know some concepts are AXIOMATIC or BASIC which means they are a base point without formal definition, because you have to start from somewhere. (see comment above this)
so of course there is no proof of any basic assumption or base concept.
but if you play the game of "ok, let's assume this trivial shit..." then your arm is twisted into agreeing with every implication, or in other words, every theorem.
