>>13590030>>13590034>That blog is from June 2015. Taleb published his blog in 2019. Why would someone fake it?Because the IQ grift has been going on long before the Taleb article. But it could also just be a mistake, either way it’s wrong. Look, you’re the same anon I BTFO in the other thread. I shouldn’t have to repeat myself to you when I destroyed every single counter argument you presented already. If you were truly scientifically minded, and not a pseud, you’d admit I’m right. What’s the point of being an IQ zealot?
> I dont understand what you hacks think non lineraity is some kind of ownFirst, because nonlinearity means measures like correlation are meaningless. Second, because IQ actually has a logarithmic relationship with measures like income meaning there’s diminishing returns that tend to 0 with an increase in IQ points. For example, the likelihood of being a NEET at 30 is the same for someone with an IQ of 130 as it is for someone with an IQ of 90.
>when you act like this apparently doesnt matter in climate science. You cant have it both ways pseudAre you schizophrenic? When did I mention climate change kek? For what it’s worth I believe in climate change but not in climate models. It’s best to think of the climate as a black box that you don’t fuck with given it’s capacity for unpredictable cataclysms. For example, a 1 degree change in climate might lead to a x10 increase in the incidence of one in a hundred year floods/heatwaves etc. Could anyone predict this? No, but could we have prevented it? Yes, by not fucking with the climate. But let’s stay on topic here schizo.
