>>13572097His paper is very confusing. He has a formula to generate primes that also spits out some non primes
It is essentially a rehash of the following theorem
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/prove-that-no-prime-triplet-exists-after-3-5-7.757537/Apparently there are no 3 consecutive odd numbers that are also prime except for 3, 5 and 7. Every other sequence of 3 odd numbers will include a non prime.
So if you start with number 5 and you add 2, you get 7, and you know the next odd number cant be prime so you skip one odd number and add 4, go from 7 to 11. Then you add 2 for the next odd number and then 4, and then 2 and then 4, this way you generate a list of odd numbers that skip every third.
5,7(9),11,13,(15),17,19,(21),23,25,(27),29,31,(33),35,37,(39),41
5,7,11,13,17,19,23,25,29,31,35,37,41
So the theorem allows him to filter the odd numbers of about one third of them with certainty they will not be primes. The remaining numbers are all primes plus all the non filtered primes. Dont know what else he did, his paper says some dumb shit sometimes but im trying not to dismiss him because of unrelated dumbassery.
