>>13566087why are you asking 4chan about something you could check for yourself? from what I've read and the videos I've watched: yes, that's exactly how vaccines are supposed to work. they act on individuals, but, much more importantly, they act on whole populations. it's the reason some illnesses have practically disappeared
>>13566088I will talk from common sense, because, again, I'm no biofag.
>I was merely illustrating the point that the fewer/absent symptoms in vaccinated individuals leads to greater propagationright, that kind of makes sense in some contexts, but at least with COVID, a great % of the infected people have no symptoms whatsoever, so I'm not sure it is a big factor in this case.
>training seems to reduce the window of transmissibilityAFAIU, it does not. from what I've read: what actually sends people to hospitals it's not even the virus itself, but a bad reaction from the immune system (look up "cytokine storm"). dunno if this has to do with the spike protein, but the modified ones in vaccines seem to cause much less effect on people.
>Many viruses encode for a specific type of enzyme that is involved in the reconstitution of viral RNA. This same enzyme is prone to mistakes, these mistakes are said mutations. This is part of the randomness of this process. In an infected cell many viral particles are formed and these each have a mostly similar RNA sequence however with the mutations introduced.and that's happens the same with normal virus processes. so, again, no difference between vaxxed and unvaxxed... except that vaccines don't produce the virus, the ones that do produce something, insert RNA or DNA to produce a modified spike protein, and that genetic material won't stick for long. so I don't see how any of this can help the virus itself mutate, unless the person being vaccinated already happens to have the virus in its system
