>>13549288>Again, stop spouting bullshit that soundsSatans malware has you gripped, preventing you from seeing your divine spark
It is clear you will not find what you seek through my words, as I have already answered your question. The very nature the universe is connected to every point to every place, and one just wakes up, and one just dies. Unto laws of nature that needn't require to have such form is satisfying enough for me. 5 senses in this cosmos, one never has a full picture, but it is within conception to have faith.
Why is god allowed to have always existed but the concept of anything else having always existed is ridiculous to you?
Time isn't a fundemental property, it is emergent from the conservation of momentum, light rays are timeless. For me its question of set theory, the paradox of infinite nothingness, all that exists by this paradoxical, primordially chaotic notion cannot be all that exists. What rests outside the universe?
>God isn't just an anthropomorphism of the all. They are completely different things. Atheists refer to the All as the singularity.belittling 'sky daddy' is attributing a human like avatar. Created in mans image is an anthropomoph. Are you sure your not being contrarian just for the sake of it?
>The All is everything there is, God is supposedly an intelligent entity capable of things like omnipotence and omnicience.As every point in space is effected by every other point, the notion of omnipotentence and awareness is valid. Like a video game recording itself, what is the medium its ran upon?
>I get what you are coming from man. I am a shroom taking, meditation loving, tree hugging hippy. But you're arguments ard terrible.Sound like your trying to see your soul but Satan is overwritting your attempts by lashing out
>There's hardly any supporting evidence.As Godels incompleteness theorem insinuates, is not faith implicit in evidence anyways?
What is the nature of rationality?
