>>13537090By definition an infinite process is never ending, it is unclear how you actually complete the convergence of an infinite series with a finite sum in the paradox posted. The math is precise, but the paradox is literally in the fact that that a infinite process never ends.
That's the mathematical side of it if you assume that mathematics correspond to physical reality, you are still left with resolving the problem of infinity.
If you don't assume that the mathematics correspond to reality or that there is a finite physical boundary for smallest distance (these two concepts are not the same), there is no paradox obviously.
