>>13540137>So just pick whatever data fits the narrative or what?They don't measure the distance to Polaris with fucking redshift, this is totally irrelevant. Are you too retarded to understand that measurements can have systematic and statistical errors? This is why people continue to take better measurements. If people make measurements that are thousands of times higher in precision and your result went away, it probably never real in the first place. Just like Tifft's claims.
>>13540140There you go again, the conspiracy theory matters more to you thank the evidence.
The best datasets available are large public surveys, he did not need telescope time to continue his work.
