>>13525179>pandemic statistics contradicting all laws of epidemiology and probabilityThis sounds like good evidence. What do you mean?
>use of massive amounts of fearmongering and psychological manipulation by all mainstream mediaStrange. In Australia, our left-leaning media has created massive vaccine hesitancy by reporting on AstraZeneca blood clots. Here's a recent one:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-08-05/nsw-woman-becomes-australia-seventh-astrazeneca-related-death/100354032>government pushing aggressively harmful practices despite the overwhelming evidence of their complete failureGovernment incompetence wouldn't convince me of a global medical conspiracy.
>censorship of dissentDumb libs being dumb libs. Plus, they likely genuinely believe that it's harmful misinformation.
>obstinate refusal to adopt the countless scientifically proven and effective curesThere aren't any. HCQ and Ivermectin aren't holding up in well-designed, rigorous studies. Ivermectin did show initial promise in vitro but with extremely toxic doses.
>unprecedented amount of power and profit gained by corporations in the pandemic yearsCapitalism applied to very good vaccines.
> WHO redefining universally accepted scientific terminology and knowledgeDon't know what you mean.
>absence of liability for the vaccine producersNot sure how this relates to medical communities tracking adverse events.
>massive double standards on the weighting of Covid vs vaccination risksThe data says that vastly more people have died from COVID than from a vaccine, but obviously this data is meaningless if you believe people are manipulating data in a globally coordinated manner.
>precognition of the "pandemic" by both conspiracy theorists and official institutions alikeSeems to be a non sequitur in play here. For everything that can go wrong in the world, there's someone who's been predicting it.
