>>13495312Yes.
The
>Mareks disease Is such a disingenuous argument that distinguishes between critical thinkers and critical drinkers.
Read the paper.
Neither the virus for Marek, that paper, the data, the "live" vaccine or the conclusions and evaluations apply in a large part or wholly to COVID.
One need only look at the use of previous influenza vaccines or vaccines including TB, Smallpox, Polio, Measles, Mumps, Rubella et al.
This idea that by vaccinating you are somehow "training," the virus to mutate more egregously/dangerously is some of the most hilarious psuedo-logic I have ever seen.
A virologist should go round personally slapping any anon that utters it seriously and then forcing them to read through A-Level Biology, the theory of evolution, history of vaccines and finally the bloody Marek's vaccine paper itself.
Dear God.
>Normally viral diseases evolve to become far less deadly over time, as their hosts have a greater chance of being in contact with new hosts.I mean just the state of this.
>The corona vaccines just minimise symptoms, but do not halt transmission (a "leaky" vaccine), which results in the virus being able to transmit from vaccinated individuals to the next.Then this
>Therefore, viral mutations that increase the virulence and symptoms will become >more common >in vaccinated individuals in an effort by the virus to spread further. I mean where does one start with dissecting such inaccurate assertions?
Let us begin by asking said anon to explain these 3 assertions for a start
Better yet, can that anon explain basic evolutionary processes through reproduction of said viruses?
