>>13505644How does this have anything to do with race? It's still a cluster, not a spectrum anyways.
>So its way more likely that colors are actually an abstraction created by the brain to interpret information in a meaningful way.Does it matter? Physics is an abstraction created to interpret physical phenomena in a meaningful way, that doesn't make it any less true. Or in this case it's less wrong than other theories we can conceive.
>there is no way to prove my red is your red.Yawn. That has literally nothing to do with my point, nor does it somehow disprove the existence of color as an objective phenomena. I never said anything about how color is percieved, just that disparate cultures label ranges of frequencies of frequencies in a similar pattern.
Just fucking admit it. ADMIT IT. Color itself exists, and I can sit here all day while you go around in circles trying to reason out of it. As to exactly why it exists is a different yet intriguing question.
