>>3884867How.
I'd been looking at it for a day now and I have no idea what you mean.
I like to scrape art from social media, so I've been on Twitter and Tumblr a lot, so I've learned that yes, it's often surprisingly easy to tell someone's online tribal affiliation by their art style, but I see nothing of what you're describing here.
Here are some large and important art tribes: gay guy, fujoshi, straight guy, fujo (Western), SJW quasi-fujo, trans-boy, bi girl/lesbian, straight girl, straight girl (non-Tumblr), Japanese (regular), Korean lunatic, Chinese fujo, Slav fujo.
They are all distinct online cultures, with distinct art styles, and while the original IP artist gives off trans-boy, OP is very clearly Slav fujo.
Twitter tenderqueers of whatever variety tend to be highly PC, corrosively boring, socially malicious Antis, but the artist is a queer Slav on Telegram -- entirely different online culture, they make edgy jokes about Nazis and shit and harming homeless people (still don't get the joke there).
Most distinctly, the artist in OP makes horny art of fictional underage characters, which is only not a thing among the Twitters and Western circles, so very much not what you're describing, your vibe-detector is entirely off.
Look at more art, anon.
