>>3942272Cute Smolxiang (Xiaoxiang?)
I don't know man, I don't think there's anything wrong with "kemoshota thread" but I just feel it comes out of nowhere and it's unfortunate that it was brought up at the end of the thread. The best compromise I can think of is keeping it as is, and repeat the question in the op so it can be properly discussed. But if you want to give the new subject a try directly, go ahead, it's not that we can't go back to the current title if anons think it's a bad idea.
I made the last two threads, I was waiting before making the next one in case anyone else wanted to step up, but we've been dead for more than 24 hours already and I feel we're stuck with this. I'll wait a few hours more and if nobody makes a thread before I'll just do the repeating the question in the op thing and call it a day.
