>>3670416No. As I said, it's not just about "hairy". The fact that you already put up a false dilemma between either a young fruit or an old hairy wrinkly grape shows how detached you are from reality and male morphology.
Second, overall liking a twink or even a femboy isn't wrong. There are some that even I find attractive. But there's one very VERY useful trait that evolution has given to animals: pattern recognition.
If one thing is off, that's normal. If two things are off, it's an outlier. When many things are off, you've got yourself a suspicious case.
Now it's not only the fact that you like a twink or a femboy. They're the ONLY thing you apparently like. Anything that's not like them invokes a reaction of disgust in you, as seen by your characterisation of the average male.
Now what do twinks and femboys have in common? Hairless, slender... But overall >looking younger than they actually are<. Now there is nothing wrong with that in principle... But where do you draw the line? Would you fuck an 18 year old that looks like a 15 year old?
If yes, you are attracted to the physique of minors. The question is... Would you go younger? Would you fuck a 16 year old that looks like a 14 year old? Obviously you're gonna say no to save your face. But we know that you're lying. Because on the internet you're indulging yourself with pictures of underage boys. Talking to likeminded people how these underage boys are the basis of your sexual attraction and how they are ideal.
What reason do I have then to believe that you're NOT a pedo? You dislike any and all characteristics of puberty. Even femboys are loved for their "uwu feminine penis", fetishizing the looks of prepubescent dicks. You browse and collect images of underaged drawn kids. All that, but you wouldn't ever be attracted to a minor? Shut up. Shut the fuck up. The only thing that's stopping you from harming a child are the laws and a vigilante society.
Seek THERAPY.
