>>9735023Close how?
How close?
Lets take a sum of partials sums over 9/10^n up to an arbitrary point
0.9999...99 <---- n-1, previous
0.9999...999 <---- n, current
0.9999...9999 <---- n+1, next
So how close to 1 are you? It's certainly not within 1 element. So is it 2 elements?
10?
How close do you actually think you are to 1?
Are you confusing infinite arbitrary accuracy with knowable accuracy?
Like are you confusing that if 10 decimals are required, 0.999999999 is arbitrarily close to 1?
Do you not understand there is no implement of required decimal accuracy, and that the only limit of work is the balue to which n increments to, which is fucking infinity aka never ending?
You dont have to fill 10 decimals
You have to fill infinite decimals
Heres you:
0.9999999999
Heres the fucking requirement:
0.9999999999xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx...
Fill in all the fucking decimal places nigger. Then you can start talking about "being arbitrarily close" to 1.
