>>9677813>Government subsidiesBetter to subsidize companies providing innovatin than shitty legacy companies like GM who can't keep their shit together doing nothing impressive.
>glorified lane keep assist.Exactly what it is claimed to be.
>He didnt even manage to achieve first reusable rocket, that claim goes to BO.Worthless distinction. SpaceX had the first reusable orbital rocket that could take meaningfful payload and didn't have assloads of upkeep and horrendous turn around.
New Shepard is a worthless novelty and BO/Bezos has had about as much impact on the aerospace industry as Virgin Galactic (Read: Zero)
Meanwhile in less than 20 years SpaceX has completely disrupted the launch market top to bottom and provides the cheapest ride to orbit per unit mass. Blue Origin hasn't even made it to orbit and has been around longer.
NASA had a partially reusable orbital rockets with the STS program. It was just horrendously expensive and had long turn around times.
McDonnell Douglas literally beat BO to the arbitrary "hurr reuseable tail landing rocket" goal with the DC-X. BO hasn't done anything original of note, not one thing.
>He has yet to prove "muh reusability", he still launches the rocketd like twice at max,Reputability was under development and testing proof of concept with Block 3 and 4 F9 1.1's.
He literally has proven the ability to partially reuse an orbital rocket.
Block 5 was always going to be the full reuseability rocket and it is flying this month.
>so they are definitely notThe rockets that are reuseable and have been reused definitely are not reusable. Ok, got it. You're a moron.
>Musk doenst even has the capacity to launch that many satellitesF9/H can easily launch multiples of payloads. BFR is being built with the multilaunch of payloads as a key feature. Trying to base future plans on present capabilities when a company like SpaceX is advancing and growing so quickly again shows how stupid you are.
