>>9661681That's how I though of it. In my mind it was "because the relationship between 9 and 6 is wrong for op's idea to work" as an initial thought, and then further extrapolated, you would have to break the number down somewhat like
>>9661639, but i thought of it like 96 = ( 9 * 10 ) +6 .
feel free to laugh at me those with larger lobes than i.
