>>9506363>Loehle 2007Really amateur attempt full of mistakes, which is why it was never published by a reputable journal:
http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2007/12/past-reconstructions/>Monckton graphThis is pure bullshit as is everything that comes out of Monckton's brain. The IPCC never projected 1.67 degrees per century over that time frame.
>The total amount the oceans have risen is a few centimetersIt's rising a centimeter every 3-4 years now, which is unprecedented in human history.
>The observed temperature increase so far amounts to less than a fiftieth of a degreeThis is a laughable lie. It's a fiftieth of a degree PER YEAR, which is again unprecedented in human history.
>Climate scientists pressured science journals to stop publishing articles contradicting them.Another filthy lie. It's not climate scientists' fault that deniers are so fucking retarded they can't create a scientific paper.
>Polar bears have increasedNo one actually figured out how many polar bears there were globally until a few years ago, so this is another lie.
>Antarctica has gained ice.Another lie.
https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/30880>The arctic would be ice-free by 2013No climate scientist said this, liar.
>NOAA was caught skewing data to support the climate change agendaI don't see how NOAA's adjustments support the "climate change agenda" when they actually decrease the gloabl warming trend. Pic related, liar.
>Actual consensus is 0.3%Another lie, that's just counting papers which did not give an opinion as not part of the consensus, even though the research agrees with the consensus. See the following for proof of the 97% consensus:
W. R. L. Anderegg, “Expert Credibility in Climate Change,”
P. T. Doran & M. K. Zimmerman, "Examining the Scientific Consensus on Climate Change,"
N. Oreskes, “Beyond the Ivory Tower: The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change,”
Why are deniers such laughable retarded liars?
