>>9090303 No. Even if aging were stopped no one would live forever; accidents happen, sickness happens, natural disasters happen, war happens.
Also, resource-wise we couldn't afford to have absolutely no one dying unless we reduced child production to near zero at some point in the future. And that's never going to happen. If it did, (which it won't) our species' evolution would halt until we're replaced by a better genetically engineered species or robots.
You might ask 'oh, what if we only make geniuses immortal? They're useful!' Well yeah, but another thing to take into account is that the human brain isn't unlimited. Everything they can't forget takes up space that new information could have taken up. After a while they'll cease to remember new information and be unable to learn.
When immortality is achieved. It likely won't even be widely distributed to everyone (ie; peons like you.) Or at least not for a long time after its invention.
TL;DR: No, and immortality is dumb.
