>>8751312Look pal, I'm sorry if I've damaged your precious feelings, but I'm not particularly concerned with seeming likeable on an anonymous imageboard and conversating with you has been akin to smashing my head into a brick wall.
I have read everything I can surmise as you having posted. Your argument began as such, as far as I understand it:
"We don't know what created matter but believing it was a God is bad because it causes people to become religious, which leads to negative societal effect."
Firstly, this does not concern the topic of the thread, nor the topic of the post you originally quoted
>>8751021; the former is "is there a logical reason to believe in God" and the latter is "Yes, because the Universe was created by something and a being that exists outside of physics creating it works."
The reason why it does not concern these topics is that you're arguing on a moral level: what we SHOULD believe in in the context of a better humanity, whereas the post you replied to was arguing on a logical level - what we SHOULD believe in in the context of likely solutions to what created the universe.
You then attempted to argue that a black hole created... our solar system in particular, apparently? Fine. That does not answer the question of the thread nor of the original post you replied to, and is therefore pointless.
