>>8085437Not him, but:
>The hereditary component of intelligence is well-supported by scienceNobody here doubts that. The problem is you attributing a difference in intelligence between races (if it exists, IQ =/= "intelligence") to genetics, without actual evidence.
>better education can't wholly make up for itThis is an unfalsifiable claim (at least for the time being) influenced by your own agenda. Same thing you accuse the "left" (or 3rd wave feminism/SJWs, which is what /pol/ really means when talking about "leftists") of.
If anything, the fact that there exist black people (I'm moving this argument to what you really want to talk about, white vs black) that have succeeded in their lives and are more intelligent than people of the same "race" as well as whites shows that education can more than make up for the perceived difference in intelligence.
