>>10801174>photon bounces offThink it might be absorption then ejection.
>waveform contracting to a very small location, so the particle is probably in a very very small area.Not with conventional measurements. Usually it's a wall splat, or orientation. I'm still getting back to date. But I think a waveform in collapse has been measured over milliseconds. For a super position in a device of sorts.
>electron waveform interacting with the screen so it continuously contracts to some tiny areaExtended field interaction? Or moments before impact?
Well either way, it's not settled yet. You've got a few operations of Q waves.
Bohmian mechanics suggests quantum states observe quantum states. I read it as a wave peaks adding up but not a measurement itself. But can be measured.
Those wave peaks are correlative when a wire frame is drawn from them. Giving pathing knowlege.
then there's Copenhagen interpretation
>Despite an extensive literature which refers to, discusses, and criticizes the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, nowhere does there seem to be any concise statement which defines the full Copenhagen interpretationBasically you're golden whenever you reference it ;)
The statistical interpretation.
Literally it's just a statistic.
There's more. But Copenhagen kinda spams over them.
>A professor said though that waveform collapse is an absolutely discrete process.Doesn't seem the case if a wave in collapse was measured, But I can't remember source.
>can the waveform collapse for one observer but not for another>this is probably a really stupod question because I dont even know qmI've been interested in this for too long. And I still have to check basics.
For observers. Seemingly yes, some sort of wave blind spot to interaction constituting a observation. If that wave collapse was true.