You know whenever a fact checker says "mixture", it's basically entirely true and the fact checker is just coping and calling it false, right?>This meme failed to take into account an essential piece of context in any discussion of mass shootings and those who perpetrate them: how you define a mass shooting.
Except the meme did define it, and pretty clearly: a mass-shooting is 4+ victims.>The August 2019 meme stated that its inclusion criteria were incidents in which four or more people were shot in a single incident. It did not specify any other criteria, such as whether the total number shot could include the perpetrator, whether it included incidents that took place in private dwellings, whether it included terrorism or gang-related shootings, and so on. >“List of mass shootings in the United States in 2019.” It’s clear that that list did include some gang-related shootings, some which took place in a private dwelling, and several incidents in which multiple people were shot but nobody died.
Who gives a shit? So if a nigger is killing gang bangers, that's somehow not a mass shooting? Let me guess... Is it because the victims are black? Libshits are the real racists here.
And here's the important part:>Our relatively brief overview of the alleged shooters included in the August 2019 meme indicates that it was broadly fairly accurate. It contained a few errors, but was faithful overall to its own criteria.
Oh hey, looks like the image is accurate after all! Consider this meme rebunked.