Anon?
He's not successful. He's not skilled. He's not famous. But he sees things how they are, and that's how he knows he isn't good through no fault of his own. In fact, here's some reasons

>He claims other artists trace to get by - they look at pictures! Basically tracing. He'd never debase himself like that
>He claims he's done his studies and it just isn't adding up. He has done one study

>He claims asian / korean / japanese / scrimblo genes
>He does not know what survivorship bias is

>He shows another artist that has rapidly progressed
>Naturally, this means he cannot progress at any speed

>He maligns that he's simply too old to get into art - he's twenty five!
>Just don't think about those people who learn entire new careers in their 30s and go on to become very successful
>Those are just special one off individuals that he can't compare to to any degree . He will never pick up a pen.

>Why should he even try? The only successful people nowadays are a group he doesn't like
>Here, he has statistics and facts
>That have a small sample size and ignore market realities

>What? do THAT?
> He'd never debase himself like that
>Other artists who succeed that way are hacks
>He's a true scottsman, even if it means he's doomed to be unknown

Do not weep for anon. He is truly the unsung, disadvantaged victim.