>>5698310> Is pic rel a woman? Maybe. But you have to admit that at a certain level of abstraction or stylization you start to respond to the symbols differently than you respond to the real deal.True, but those symbols correspond to something. It would be delusional to compare features of a little girl and compare them to the features of a tree, skyscraper, satellite,... The features of what makes a real little girl and a drawing aren’t different but sometimes exaggerated. It’s still attraction to a little girl.
>Similarly there are other scenarios where we understand that media isn't the real deal. Watching an action movie doesn't make you an accomplice to murder or a potential psychopath. The type of person that watches Verdun regularly is very different from the person that spends hours on /gif/ in the war threads.But do they coom to it? What difference does it make if someone who cooms to action movies vs cooming to Verdun? They both coom to violence like a lolicon and pedo both enjoy looking at the form of a little girl for sexual purposes. Your example describes is a person who purely watching slice of life moe non sexually vs someone who cooms to real life cunny. I’m talking about someone who looks up loli hentai to coom and someone who cooms to real life cunny. Is it so far fetched for someone to like drawings of little girl to like real little girls?