>>4776663>Someone’s 8 will be another’s 4,that's litterally impossible if you're not biased. You have to be judging on very personal criterias to reach such different results. For example, let's take the lolibro's sketch here
>>4776450I'm not into loli. Does that mean that it's automaticaly below 5 because I don't find it attractive? no, I rate it at a solid 7 because even if it's not my thing, I recognise the skill and proficiency of the artist. If I was into loli, maybe I'd put it at 8, but we would be at a 7-8 disparity, not at 4-8.
I'm not gay at all, but I can rate a man's looks at 9, without getting an once of attraction for him. You can totally recognize attractiveness without being attracted, if not you're just too biased