>>4203687Sure. But pedophilia harms people when acted upon irl, whereas being gay does not. Thus the comparison is a tad fucked
>>4203692>Then, by what logic does the availability of fiction turn people into pedophiles but doesn't turn them gay?That's not what I am saying. I am saying that if you are attracted to something, then by definition you would be classified as having that attraction. If you jerk off to men you're gay, if you jerk it to loli you're a pedo. It has nothing to do with availability.
>Is there more animal rape in the world today because of fantasy furry porn?No, there isn't. I'll add though that furries aren't attracted to actual animals. Being into animals (in furry circles 2d animal porn is called feral) will get you shit-canned from most furry conventions and social groups.
>>4203693>where should I get a better sampleHow about a general population sample of people attracted to loli? /a/ is a biased sample because on average the people here tend to be more fucked up than most people. They're more extreme here.
>>4203707Advocating something is not the same as having an interest or a belief. If someone said "I think that more people should kill non-muslims" then that'd be advocating, if they said "I don't believe that non-Muslims deserve life" then that'd be a belief.
>>42037132d interest is not real world action. I play Hitman frequently and have been in the same room as someone while I have had a gun with me, and yet I didn't murder anyone.