>>3696436Hey there, -601 here.
As to your first question, sorry, I did wonder whether I should explain what I meant there.
Not "female art" as a unit, rather what this (
>>3694686) anon said about looking at each female as an individual.
Example: My subject-related interest is a.i. sci-fi robots and things, but I have female friends who are really into cars and graffiti, or native american culture, or a specific video game's lore, creatures, a specific historical period, legends, mecha, etc. Old non-artist females often appreciate realism, young girls might like things a bit cartoony, younger women might like semi-realism. Males and females appreciate things with a spark to them, things done well.
Females vary in their interests are much as guys, so there is no one subject which is best. Rather, I’d guess the right direction to take for you is something that will both appeal best to everyone in general, and one that will leave you feeling best about yourself as well: go for the subjects that you yourself love, because this will show through in your art: you will bring more energy and enthusiasm into your work, and work the better for it. This will give your work an extra dimension of appeal that you won’t be able to simulate if you forced yourself to work with subjects which feel flat and boring to you.
>>wouldn't a female be more attracted to oppositesI’ve discovered I most appreciate people who think like I do, but I also know females who are attracted to their opposites. Again, tastes vary, and people are generally too complex to be easily parsed. Just be your best self, however you are, (not necessarily Society’s take) and you’ll fill your own skin better and will be nicer to be around, all around. Luck', friend
