>>2210157>>2210175>>2210258This is all about the fact that ability to see doe not always corelate with the ability to draw. The original poster pointed out all the major issues, in a way that made sense. I think that the fact that he was actually constructive, humble and generous, combined with the fact that his sketch actually outlines some of the issues, is great, and should be more common in these threads.
The irrelevant shitstorm that followed thiugh, I'm not so sure of. Both him and I know that we have our flaw, doesn't mean that we can benefit eachoter.
>>2210172Thank you so much for your feed back and tips, I'll check out Hamptons and gesture drawing!
>>2210284While I mostly agree with you comment, I have to point out that this is a citique thread, and that giving constructive critisism is kinda what we do here. It's fully possible to git gud solely by practising on your, but doing that would make these kind of threads kinda worhless.
As I said, I do agree with you, and should practise more, but the problem is I don't really know where to start. As my time is pretty limited, I don't want to go through all the exercises in the sticky, I want to finde some thing thet would help me improve noticably, even by only putting down a few hours a week.
(But now I'll check out the Hamptons and gesture dawif, as the other anon pointed out.)
Also, this was done for a requester at /b/. I set my time frame to 2 hours and didn't want to put too much effort into it. I just thouht that if someone was able to fix some flaws is the time I was cleaning up the lines, it would benefit both me and the requester.
>>2210348He practices Loomis and his sketch is by no means unnecessarily polishes. The way I see it, he is using his time to help and improve, and may very well get really good at some point.
