>>4707177the art that you posted however is at least nuanced. There isn't anything inherently sexual in that scene, it's mostly the art style and the design that plays with your mind and brings you where it shouldn't be going. It makes you ask questions about yourself and yada yada
anime art in general lacks any kind of subtlety. You see cocks getting rammed in pussies and that's about it or there's just some evident visual titillation, nothing is really left to the imagination. A lolita adaptation would just be pornographic because it would lack all the artistic intent of the book. Which is why in general I love the anime aesthetic but I despise almost everything that is made in it.
Take pic related for example (it's just a random highly rated pic I found on pixiv). The rendering is good and could technically be considered good art, but the subject matter is evidently just fetish material and its purpose is none other than high quality jack off material. Why in the hell would be a character from an existing IP be in the middle of a square in bondage attire? How could this be considered artistic?
I'm not against smut, I draw that too personally, but let's not believe there's any artistic merit in this. We could get there, and probably eventually will, but it's not with the current trend of anime porn that we're going to reach that.
