>>99949134>Food episodes, boy v. girl episodes, sing a long episodes, etc. The premise might be the same, but the take, more often than not, varies drastically, plus there's no universal rule that states that repetition is bad, it's especially irrelevent given episodic format of the show and given that there're 200 episodes remakes and repeats are to be expected.
>But it's painfully obnoxious how the writers 'address' criticism with countless thumb biting jokes even though the main demo are kids who most likely never even seen the first show. How any of this is relevent to the topic at hand: quality of writing? You might find it obnoxious for whatever reason, to be quite frank I'm not a big fan of those episodes myself (except Let's get serious, since it's the best episode of the show), but it doesn't make the bad, or the premise objectively flawed. The show has plenty of references and parodies that most likely fly above its audience head, in no way does it make these episodes bad (take "Hey You, Don't Neglect Me in Your Memories" for example)
>And last for the animation, as a whole everything is bright as fuckIs there some sort of color brightness standart for good animation I haven't heard of or something? Let's start by saying that neither color brightness nor art style are directly related to quality of animation and that both are completely subjective notions to begin with. You may prefer one artstyle over the other, but it doesn't say anything about weather one artstyle is good and the other is bad.
>I just hate tween animation as a whole for being lazyYou clearly haven't made a single piece of animation, if you think that. Does frame by frame animation takes more time and effort to do? Absolutely. Does it make twin animation bad or lazy? Only if you're a braindead retard.
