>>99829606>so was Kirby'sHe was influential, primarily due to him being prolific in his artistry, but I wouldn't call him the best at Marvel, not by a long shot.
>You're still not making a very compelling argument by just stating that one is better than the other. Come on, give me a hand, I'm trying to bump your thread so it can actually stay up among all the shitposting.I just did, and then you said, "well, just because he's better at this, doesn't make him a better artist"....
I mean, aside from the obvious two being Bill Everett and Steve Ditko, you had Dick Ayers, Carl Burgos, Gene Colan, Don Heck, Bob Powell....All of which were better in regards to their ability to control scale and perspective, properly portray anatomy, and their visceral portrayal of action.
His best works, I could say are memorable. His worst are too numerous to count. Reading his run on Black Panther almost makes me cringe.
