>>99702422>mentions the Middle East in the argument of slavery to imply that Muslims treated slaves worse than Americans did>"i-i just said middle east, i didn't explicitly state muslims and islam!!!"
Reliance on scapegoats and smug reaction images just makes it obvious what kind of person you are, lmao. Accusing me of strawmanning while creating a strawman himself.
Anyone who looked into the Arab Slave Trade knows that it was nowhere as bad the Atlantic Slave Trade, and that makes sense because of the giant demand for slaves to cultivate the immense riches of newly-colonized continents.
Ironic for the uneducated to tell others to educate themselves. Like I said before, /v/ is more of your speed.>>99702462>Haiti
And that contradicts my argument how? The slavery in Haiti, as done by France, coexisted alongside the slavery in America. When Haiti gained independence, it has been consequently been bullied by both of these nations for years to come.>Middle East
Once again, Islam forbade it as it was fading out, and even then, the slavery in the Middle East still has never been as big as the slavery in America. Settle your autism.>Imperial Japan
They're also as horrible as slavery-era America, but they still haven't enslaved as much as them.
Keep crying, soyboy cuck.>>99702946
I love the smell of unsourced bullshit in the evening. The Brits? The same people who enslaved Indians and South Africans until after the 2nd World War telling anyone to stop slavery? Let alone people who abandoned slavery before any empire at the time? Fuckin' lol'd.
Islam forbade enslavement, period. Islamic empire did not enslave "infidels" nor tried to convert them, it was more economically and socially logical to let them practice their faiths and tax them to fund the armies for their protection, and other services. This is why Spain was still majorly Christian despite centuries of Moor conquest.
Retard who doesn't know Muslims dictating what their faith is about, lmfao.