>>98610405>public statementWhat are you talking about? It's obvious that it's a parody drawing. The only possible statement you can see there is that he might find them sexually attractive (but knowing Shad he's just being an edgelord for shock value).
>affected by the commentRandom assholes who would use it in a negative way are as much his responsibility as drunk drivers are Smirnoff's or Ford's.
>fake pornIt's a drawing, as in obviously "fake". Again, any resulting negativity is the fault of people who misuse it.
>children in public viewI would argue that keeping them from such things is the duty of their parents. Being under the age of majority doesn't automatically protect them from criticism or parody, by making the decision of becoming public figures they tacitly agree to having to deal with both the good and bad effects of fame.
TL;DR: if your only argument is an appeal to feelings with the "think of the children" meme, you don't have an argument.
