>>98605206You've parroted this before and you were then like you are now, even if you've slightly altered your copy pasta:
C&U is a production company that was set up IN Warner Brothers:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cruel_and_Unusual_Filmswhich is standard for studios. Clint Eastwood has 'his' company, Malpaso, also at WB. Steven Spielberg has 'his' production company, Amblin at Universal, even when he 'owned' Dreamworks SKG.
The Snyders have NO money except for fees paid to Zach, and salary to Deb, which initially came FROM WB for 300, and whatever profits were totally burnt up by the failure and losses from Sucker Punch.
For you to keep repeating your copy pasta (I noticed you dropped your Zach is the highest paid director in Hollywood) is absurd.
MoS cost more money than Zach and Deb claimed in income from 2004-2013.
Neither of them are listed among the richest people in Hollywood by Forbes. The Wall Street Journal/Dow Jones - Market Watch doesn't list them as the top 10 wealthiest director/producers:
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/10-richest-hollywood-movie-moguls-2015-02-12, the poorest of whom is worth 670. It would have cost the Snyders a good couple $100M to do MoS, which they don't have.
WB had the concept of a shared universe before Marvel, with Green Lantern, Batman Begins and SR, the story about the FU with Superman have a lot more to do with a lot of different things than people keep mouthing off here about the Siegel lawsuit.
They aren't even listed as POWERFUL producers by one of the TWO industry newspapers for film production on the planet, in 2015, before the implosion of BvS and MoS, even though MCU Feige is listed there, as is Charles Roven (as much for the Nolanverse as for his work as the ACTUAL PRODUCER for MoS, BvS and WW).
You are maybe 20% close with some of your assertions which otherwise have maybe 10% actual facts, 20 guesses over which the public/news reporters have no real knowledge and 50 total nonsense.
