>>98590325Apologies for the YouTube star but I just wanted to make a point. One issue is that with some art styles the characters don't even look much like actual humans. The ppg look like little balloons or weird fish or something. I remember when someone drew a stick figure and wrote "this is a naked five year old girl" under it. Is that stick figure really child porn?
Now it's very clear that there are real pedos who create and are into this kind of thing. But since characters can be abstract and not look, sound, or act their ages because it's fiction it gets into a weird place. I believe there are people here who are "waifufags" for this or that under 18 character who aren't actually pedos, in fact the majority probably aren't. Remember when there was a pop song that jokes about finding Sailor Moon hot? And I'm not even going to harp on some teenagers vs kids thing, the thing is that when the characters are a giant circle and a few lines, I'm not sure their "age" makes much difference. Same thing with anyone who has ever found and anthro character attractive. I don't think the whole Spame Jam audience who thought Lola Bunny was cute were 100% into real life beastiality. And I'm saying this though I think loli and shota are sick and disgusting. I'm just saying I realistically do not think there are that many people who want to have sex with real animals or real children, that everyone who's had a crush on a cartoon character that's anthro or under 18 is one, it seems silly to think so.
