>>98352913>art style is what has set him apartIt isn't. It's a matter of his volume, site, and the fetishes he draws. His "art style" is recognizable, but it's not a product of marketing or clever design, just him simply drawing a lot.
>Shad is a professional smut artist>none of it is mistakes it's all style you're just butthurt he's successfulI should have said Any professional artist OR good smut artist. He indeed would be a professional smut artist, he's ran a business and made good money off of it. But don't mistake success for artistic merit. His stuff is riddled with bad anatomy, lack of understanding of lighting, form, terrible lines,and bad shapes. These things aren't intentional and actually hurt his art. His success isn't based on his skill, again, it's mainly based on the fact he'll draw pretty gross, edgy, fetishy stuff of tons of popular characters in a high volume.
I really don't like his art, and he seems like a covert pedo, not really because he draws cartoon children sexually but moreso real ones.
>>98353078>>98353218You're either young or jaded. There's no right way to draw anything, correct, but when drawing people, especially when attempting to make the most appealing art it's best to understand certain basics that let you draw good art. The people that draw Superman Batman etc learned and adapted anatomy, perspective, composition, all these things so they could improve their art, because that's what it's for. It's not there to meet some means of perfection and turn your art into assembly line crap, it's there to make it better and let you deliberately improve your art.
