>>98047870Locke was mostly a political thinker and state theorist.
Within his own frame of reference he was not so wrong.
Now, if he was an evolutionary biologist and anthropologist too, he would be a moron to say that. In the context of ALL behavior. Not just political interaction with the background of a common socialisation into the British upper crust.
Really, building your argument for anything on Locke alone is like rejecting democracy because Plato objected the glaring flaws of Athens in particular regarding their susceptibility to demagogues.
We don't follow people for doing everything right all the time, but for advancing their fields by getting something more right.
