>>97827091You see you are right but you take what I posted in a wrong way.
I'm obviously not advocating incest, this guy said it inevitably leads to a retard infant.
It's not true and it's still unlikely, meaning there is a much bigger chance that the child will not be retarded then otherwise.
Yes the chance of genetic disorders is higher than if the breeding is not incestuous.
I don't give an example of dogs to state that this is ultimately the way to go, I just used it to illustrate the mechanism, and the fact that it's as beneficial as detrimental in the short run.
(It can be, and is used to promote desired traits)
In the long run, what you say about purebred dogs is obviously and absolutely true, but it's only a problem if you sustain this method of breeding over generations.
The question was about two siblings and their immediate offspring.
A mixed genetic pool is the best and people who are racist are idiots for this fact alone.
Also in general the most beautiful people are those with the most varied ancestry/genepool.
