>>97338010I really wanted to like this comic. The artwork detail is superb: characters are well drawn (Judy looks really good, on model with a little artistic liberty taken to make her a bit sexy), facial expressions are good, backgrounds are well done, etc. But the writing is awful. It started out fine, but fell apart. Aside from a few grammatical errors, no one sounds very in character, especially Nick. Sure, it was surprising to see him wanting to keep the baby (many assumed he was the one wanting it gone, because stereotypes), but this entire story could have been re-worked so the characters sound more believable. Instead it comes off as campy, soap opera writing. At the end of this comic I should be feeling something for the characters. I should be feeling something for Judy, at least. I didn't feel a damn thing.
This brings me to a point I want to make, that I am sure some will disagree on. Weaver's Zootopia comics: I was immediately impressed at his writing. He knew how to write characters wherein they felt very in character, and he knew how to write a relationship between two people that felt genuine. His art is simple, but his writing was solid and made his scribbles work. Here in this comic, you have artwork with a ton of detail, and the artist does a good job expressing emotion through the use of expressions and body motions, but it falls flat because the writing is sub-par. This art is detailed, but the writing is poor, and as a result the artwork doesn't work as well as it should. It almost feels as if its a waste. I find that very frustrating.
